Tag: acquired knowledge

  • The centrality of tawhid in education beyond humanising

    We live in a time when moral language is abundant, yet moral conviction appears increasingly fragile. Nations speak of justice while selectively applying it. International law is invoked when convenient and ignored when inconvenient. The same act is condemned in one context and justified in another. Even more troubling is the normalisation, or quiet acceptance, of the killing of innocent lives under the justification of security, retaliation, or national interest. This is not merely a political failure. It is a deeper failure of moral formation.

    At first glance, many would argue that the solution lies in strengthening ethics or promoting human values. In recent years, there has been a growing call to “humanise education”, to ensure that learners are not merely trained to be competent, but also compassionate and socially responsible. This is an important step, and it reflects an awareness that technical knowledge alone cannot sustain a just society. However, the question must be asked: is humanising education sufficient?

    Humanising education, as commonly understood, seeks to restore dignity, empathy, and ethical awareness in the learning process. It aims to produce individuals who are sensitive to suffering and committed to fairness. Yet, when examined closely, much of this approach remains anthropocentric. It places the human being at the centre, with morality derived from human consensus, cultural norms, or shifting global standards. As a result, while it aspires to universality, it often becomes selective. What is considered just in one setting may be reinterpreted in another. Compassion can be extended to some, and withheld from others. The human remains the reference point, and therefore the standard is not fixed.

    This is where the emphasis on tawhid becomes not only relevant, but essential.

    Tawhid, the recognition of the absolute oneness of Allah, is not merely a theological statement. It is an epistemological and moral foundation that defines reality, knowledge, and purpose. It situates the human being not as the ultimate reference point, but as a servant and vicegerent accountable to the Creator. In doing so, it anchors ethics beyond human preference. Justice is not negotiated. It is upheld as a divine command. The sanctity of life is not conditional. It is absolute, because it is bestowed by Allah.

    When education is grounded in tawhid, it undergoes a fundamental transformation. Knowledge is no longer fragmented into isolated disciplines, each operating with its own assumptions. Instead, all knowledge is understood as originating from a single divine source, unified in purpose and direction. Learning is not simply the acquisition of information or skills. It is a process of recognising truth, understanding responsibility, and aligning one’s actions with divine guidance.

    More importantly, tawhid redefines what it means to be human. A human being is not merely a rational or social creature. A human being is a moral agent entrusted with responsibility, bound by accountability, and guided by revelation. This understanding reshapes education at its core. It is no longer sufficient to produce individuals who are empathetic. Education must produce individuals who are just, even when justice is difficult. It must produce individuals who uphold truth, even when it is against their own interest or the interest of their nation.

    This distinction is critical in the context of global crises. The selective outrage we witness today, the inconsistency in condemning violence, and the justification of harm against innocent populations are not simply failures of policy. They reflect a deeper inconsistency in moral grounding. When morality is derived from human systems alone, it becomes vulnerable to power, influence, and narrative control. Tawhid, in contrast, provides a constant reference point. It demands that the value of a single innocent life remains the same, regardless of geography, identity, or political alignment.

    Therefore, the call is not merely to humanise education, but to transcend it.

    Humanising education, when grounded in tawhid, is elevated from a human-centred endeavour to a divinely guided process of formation. Compassion is no longer an optional virtue. It is an expression of faith. Justice is no longer situational. It is an obligation. Knowledge is no longer neutral. It carries ethical weight and spiritual consequence.

    In this framework, competence, compassion, and conscience are not separate attributes to be cultivated independently. They are integrated manifestations of a unified understanding of existence. Competence ensures that one is capable. Compassion ensures that one cares. Conscience, rooted in tawhid, ensures that one acts with accountability to Allah.

    The implications for education are profound. Curricula must move beyond the transmission of knowledge to the formation of character. Assessment must go beyond technical proficiency to include ethical reasoning and integrity. Educators must see themselves not merely as instructors, but as guides in the development of the whole human being. Institutions must recognise that their role is not only to produce graduates, but to shape individuals who will uphold justice in a complex and often unjust world.

    The moral crisis we observe today is not accidental. It is the outcome of an educational paradigm that has, in many cases, separated knowledge from meaning, and competence from conscience. Reintroducing humanity into education is necessary, but it is not sufficient. Without a higher anchor, humanity alone can still falter.

    Tawhid provides that anchor. It unifies knowledge, grounds ethics, and directs purpose. It reminds us that every action, whether individual or collective, is ultimately accountable to Allah. In a world where moral standards appear increasingly negotiable, this anchoring is not only relevant, it is indispensable.

    The way forward is clear. We must move beyond humanising education as an end in itself, and embrace an education that is fully grounded in tawhid. Only then can we hope to cultivate individuals who will not only feel for humanity, but stand firmly for justice, regardless of the cost.

  • Science, Health, and the Philosophy of Knowledge in the Thought of Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas

    Introduction

    Tan Sri Prof. Diraja Dr Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas is widely known for his contributions to Islamic philosophy, education, and the study of civilisation. While he did not write specifically on medicine or health sciences, his philosophical framework on knowledge, education, and the Islamic worldview offers important insights for understanding science and health in the contemporary Muslim context. His writings emphasise that knowledge must be understood within a coherent worldview rooted in tawhid, where intellectual inquiry, including scientific investigation, is guided by ethical responsibility and metaphysical clarity (Al-Attas, 1978; Al-Attas, 1995).

    Science within the Islamic worldview

    Al-Attas argued that modern knowledge, including science, is shaped by the worldview of the civilisation that produces it. He observed that modern Western science emerged within a secular intellectual tradition that tends to separate knowledge from divine guidance. For him, this separation creates a conceptual imbalance because knowledge is no longer connected to its ultimate source, which in the Islamic understanding is Allah.

    In contrast, the Islamic worldview situates all knowledge within the unity of God, or tawhid. Scientific inquiry is therefore not rejected but placed within a broader metaphysical framework. Nature is understood as a creation of Allah, and studying it becomes a legitimate and meaningful intellectual activity. However, scientific knowledge must remain connected to ethical and spiritual considerations so that it contributes to human well-being and justice rather than purely technological advancement (Al-Attas, 1978).

    The hierarchy and classification of knowledge

    A key element in al-Attas’s philosophy is the classification of knowledge. He distinguished between revealed knowledge (naqli), which originates from revelation, and acquired knowledge (aqli), which arises from human reasoning, observation, and experience. Science and medicine fall within the category of acquired knowledge.

    Al-Attas did not diminish the importance of acquired knowledge. On the contrary, he recognised its necessity for the development of civilisation and the welfare of human society. However, he insisted that acquired knowledge must remain guided by revealed knowledge so that intellectual activity does not lose its ethical and metaphysical direction. This hierarchy ensures that scientific inquiry remains aligned with truth and justice rather than becoming detached from moral accountability (Al-Attas, 1995).

    Ethics and responsibility in scientific knowledge

    One of the central concerns in al-Attas’s philosophy is the ethical orientation of knowledge. He emphasised that knowledge must lead to justice and proper conduct. Knowledge that is not guided by ethical discipline may lead to confusion and misuse.

    This concern is particularly relevant in scientific and medical practice. Scientific progress brings great power, but without ethical grounding it may lead to exploitation or harm. Al-Attas argued that knowledge must always be accompanied by proper discipline, or adab, which ensures that knowledge is used responsibly and in accordance with moral principles.

    In the context of medicine and health sciences, this perspective highlights the importance of aligning scientific expertise with compassion, integrity, and accountability. Scientific competence alone is insufficient if it is not guided by ethical responsibility towards patients and society.

    The concept of ta’dib in education

    Al-Attas introduced the concept of ta’dib as the proper aim of education. He argued that education should cultivate individuals who possess intellectual clarity, moral discipline, and awareness of their responsibilities within the order of creation (Al-Attas, 1980). For him, the purpose of education is not merely to produce skilled workers or professionals but to nurture balanced human beings who understand the proper place of knowledge.

    Applied to science and health professions, the concept of ta’dib implies that medical and scientific training should go beyond technical competence. Education should develop professionals who combine knowledge with ethical awareness, humility, and a sense of service to humanity. In this sense, the training of doctors and scientists becomes part of a broader moral and intellectual formation.

    Science and civilisation

    Al-Attas viewed knowledge as a central element in the formation of civilisation. Scientific knowledge, when properly understood, contributes to the advancement of human society. However, civilisation cannot be sustained by technological progress alone. It must be guided by a coherent worldview that integrates intellectual, ethical, and spiritual dimensions.

    In this framework, science and medicine play an important role in improving human welfare, but they must remain aligned with higher ethical principles. Scientific progress that is detached from moral guidance risks undermining the very civilisation it seeks to advance.

    Implications for modern science and health

    Although al-Attas did not specifically address contemporary medical or public health issues, his philosophy provides a framework for thinking about science and health in a holistic manner. His emphasis on the unity of knowledge, the ethical orientation of intellectual activity, and the moral formation of educated individuals offers a perspective that remains relevant for modern scientific disciplines.

    For fields such as medicine and public health, this perspective encourages a balance between scientific competence and ethical responsibility. The pursuit of knowledge should aim not only at technical advancement but also at the protection of human dignity and the welfare of society.

    Conclusion

    The intellectual legacy of Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas lies in his effort to restore clarity to the meaning and purpose of knowledge. While his writings do not focus directly on science or medicine, his philosophical framework provides a foundation for understanding scientific inquiry within a moral and spiritual worldview. By emphasising the integration of knowledge, ethics, and civilisation, his work continues to offer valuable insights for contemporary discussions on education, science, and the role of knowledge in human life.

    References

    Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1978). Islam and Secularism. Kuala Lumpur: Muslim Youth Movement of Malaysia.

    Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1980). The Concept of Education in Islam: A Framework for an Islamic Philosophy of Education. Kuala Lumpur: ABIM.

    Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1995). Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam: An Exposition of the Fundamental Elements of the Worldview of Islam. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC.